Cases 1 - 10 of 429
Hernandez Richter v. Romero, et al.
as 24-1290
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO HERNANDEZ RICHTER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ROMERO, Corrections Officer and JULIE BOWERS, Corrections Officer
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, J Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Richard M Johnson, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gutierrez-Valencia #091102 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Luis Gutierrez-Valencia
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Sean Malone, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Bower v. Loandepot, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
David Bower
Defendant:
LOANDEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Button #257700 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Button
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, Esteban Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinski v. City of Philomath et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pinski
Defendant:
City of Philomath, Blake Bowers, City of Corvallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barton v. Bower et al
as 6:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dale Alan Barton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Bower, MD, Michelle Davies, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daroya Isaiah v. loanDepot, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Daroya Isaiah, Jonathan Rosas, Joel Eggleton and others
Defendant:
loanDepot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
