Voting Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
WISCONSIN VOTERS ALLIANCE et al v. PENCE et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03791
Plaintiff: BRENDA SAVAGE, RICHARD W KUCKSDORF, DEBI HAAS and others
Defendant: BUTCH MILLER, U.S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, LEE CHATFIELD and others
Respondent: Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A. and Erick G. Kaardal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Martin et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2018cv04776
Defendant: Beauty Baldwin, Ralph F. (Rusty) Simpson, Seth Harp and others
Plaintiff: Jasmine Clark, Jeanne Dufort, Dana Bowers and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Fazal Khan and Carolyn Bourdeaux for Congress
Amicus Curiae: Campaign Legal Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heindel et al v. Andino et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01887
Defendant: Billy Way, Jr, Nicole Spain Wright, Marilyn Bowers and others
Plaintiff: Phil Leventis and Frank Heindel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baten et al v. McMaster et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00510
Plaintiff: Eugene Baten , Chester Willis , Charlette Plummer-Wooley and others
Defendant: Henry McMaster, Mark Hammond, South Carolina Election Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Ronald Green v. Loretta Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1378
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROY L. PERRY-BEY and RONALD M. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacity, ANGELA J. MILLER, U.S. Attorney, Voting Section, in her individual and official capacity, T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, Chief U.S. Attorney, in his individual and official capacity and others
Robert Sarvis v. Charles Judd We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1162
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT C. SARVIS
Plaintiff: LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, WILLIAM HAMMER, JEFFREY CARSON and others
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES E. JUDD, in his individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, DONALD PALMER, in his individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections and KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, in her individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections
Bethune-Hill et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00852
Plaintiff: Golden Bethune-Hill, Christa Brooks, Chauncey Brown and others
Defendant: Virginia State Board of Elections, James B. Alcorn, Virginia Department of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: OneVirginia2021: Virginians for Fair Redistricting
Intervenor Defendant: Virginia House of Delegates, William J. Howell and M. Kirkland Cox
Special Master: Bernard Grofman
Interested Party: Virginia State Conference of NAACP Branches, New Virginia Majority, Princeton University and others
Petitioner: Wakeel Abdul-Sabur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Green v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-1761
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD M. GREEN
Plaintiff: ROY L. PERRY-BEY
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacity, ANGELA J. MILLER, U.S. Attorney, Voting Section, in her individual and official capacity, T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, Chief U.S. Attorney, in his individual and official capacity and others
Sarvis et al v. Judd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00479
Plaintiff: Robert C. Sarvis , Libertarian Party of Virginia , William Hammer and others
Defendant: Charles E. Judd , Donald Palmer and Kimberly T. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Perry-Bey et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv00215
Plaintiff: Roy L. Perry-Bey and Ronald M. Green
Defendant: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Angela J. Miller, T. Christian Herren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?