Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BOWLING v. WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00072
Petitioner:
MICHAEL W. BOWLING
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. DWIGGINS et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Defendant:
LEEANN DWIGGINS, MADISON COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, JAKE BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWLES v. FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
WILSON JAMES E. BOWLES
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNY v. BOWLING et al
as 2:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBERT DENNY
Defendant:
TYLER BOWLING and JOSH PAXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Wabash County Sheriff et al
as 3:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
KENNIST WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Wabash County Sheriff, OFFICER C DAWES, OFFICER C BOWLING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSHA BOWLING, MATTHEW KOPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSTON v. DOLLERIS et al
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
GERALD JOHNSTON
Defendant:
TROY DOLLERIS, ROGER NEWLON, BRENT MILLER and others
Not Classified By Court:
TODD VARE and MITCHELL L. OSTERDAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLERVRAIN et al v. KIJAKAZI et al
as 1:2021cv03036
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, ROODE A. CLERVRAIN, SHAMEEL CLERVRAIN and others
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, DAN RUSYNIAK, MICHAEL GARGANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
