Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Johnson v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60884
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Mark R. Irby, David P. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60883
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Mark R Irby, David P Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accommodations)
Lopez Pena v. Cole et al
as 1:2019cv10276
Defendant:
Jay Wineberg, David N. Keley, Terry Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Lopez Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alcanter et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv02902
Plaintiff:
DAMON GIALOURIS, UDO HARTTUNG, LONNIE CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 9:2017cv80943
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson , Michelle Stone , Z. H. and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 0:2017cv60116
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Brazie Johnson
as 13-10673
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRAZIE BOYD JOHNSON
Eugene Johnson v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-17221
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE BOYD JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
LeRoy Woods v. State of Arizona, et al
as 12-15715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY L. WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, THOMAS C HORNE, named as Tom Horne; Attorney General, DOLORES J. DOOLITTLE and others
Johnson v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2010cv02096
Petitioner:
Eugene Boyd Johnson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
