Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ZEMLICK v. BURKHART et al
as 1:2022cv02319
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ZEMLICK
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRAD BURKHART, MATTHEW BOOTS, LUKE SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRURY v. BURKHART et al
as 2:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. DRURY
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, BRIDGER D. FOY, JOHN LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYNARD v. BURKHART et al
as 1:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WAYNE MAYNARD
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and QUALITY HEALTH CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennifer Wilson-Trattner v. Robert Campbell, et al
as 16-2509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER R. WILSON-TRATTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT CAMPBELL, SCOTT E. ROEGER, Deputy, individually and in his official capacity, TED MUNDEN, Lieutenant, individually and inhis official capacity and others
WILSON-TRATTNER v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2014cv01083
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, ROBERT CAMPBELL, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER R. WILSON-TRATTNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare
as 7:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Patton
Defendant:
Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Appalachian Regional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patton v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare et al
as 7:2007cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Patton
Defendant:
Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Appalachian Regional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Scantland et al v. Yokohama Rubber Company, Ltd. et al
as 5:2007cv00952
Plaintiff:
Lee Scantland, Lee Scantland, Jonathon Scantland and others
Defendant:
Yokohama Rubber Company, Ltd., Yokohama Tire Corp., Mitsubishi Motors Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
