Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wilson v. United States Postal Service
as 8:2022cv03230
Plaintiff:
Bradley Wilson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Wilson et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02729
Plaintiff:
Bradley Wilson and brandi Houghtling
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
David Wilson v. Jason Smoak, et al
as 22-13458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRADLEY WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON SMOAK, JAMES BRAZIER, SHARON KING and others
David Wilson v. Jason Smoak, et al
as 22-13341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRADLEY WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON SMOAK, MINDY VANACKRYN, NURSE KATRINA and others
Wilson v. Smoak (INMATE 4)
as 1:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
David Bradley Wilson
Defendant:
Jason Smoak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Burrell (Durell Guy)
as 22-421
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nico Burrell, AKA Zico Nico, Douglas McLarty, AKA Q-Don, AKA Q-Dizzy, Gerard Bass, AKA Roddo and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Durell Guy
Wilson v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00227
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Sgt. Watson, Mindy Vanackryn and others
Plaintiff:
David Bradley Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
David Bradley Wilson
Defendant:
C/O Creech, Sgt. Cole, Jason Smoak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00101
Plaintiff:
David Bradley Wilson
Defendant:
Mark Trawick, Jason Smoak, Lt. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
