Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Harris v. City of Titusville
as 6:2024cv00595
Plaintiff: Brandon Harris
Defendant: City of Titusville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurley v. Jones
as 4:2023cv00882
Plaintiff: Jesse L McCurley
Defendant: Shane Jones, Leo Young, Dalton Tyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2023cv00114
Petitioner: Brandon Harris
Respondent: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. USA
as 1:2023cv01538
Petitioner: Brandon Harris
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. USA
as 1:2023cv00946
Petitioner: Brandon Harris
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. Genovese
as 2:2021cv02390
Respondent: Kevin Genovese
Petitioner: Brandon Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Rogers
as 2:2021cv02230
Respondent: Sammy Rogers and Warden Douglas Williams
Petitioner: Brandon Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOTON v. THE CITY OF COATESVILLE POLCE DEPARTMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05014
Petitioner: SEAN LAMOUNT MOTON
Respondent: THE CITY OF COATESVILLE POLCE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER BRANDON HARRIS and OFFICER THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz et al v. Godinez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00315
Plaintiff: David Robert Bentz, Jesse R. Perez, Marcus A. Barry and others
Defendant: Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Tamim Abdul-Samad We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56388
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TAMIM ABDUL-SAMAD, AKA Tamin Abdul-Samad, AKA Brandon Harris

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?