Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SPARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29937
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SPARKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
White v. Theodate et al
as 1:2023cv10623
Plaintiff:
George Lamont White
Defendant:
Donald Theodate, Victor Maxwell, Cassandro Joseney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sparks v. McDonalds Co et al
as 4:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sparks
Defendant:
McDonalds Co and Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
El v. State of Georgia et al
as 3:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kwasi El and Christopher Lanier Hudson
Defendant:
Donald Howse, Brandon Sparks, Wendy Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
SPARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04003
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SPARKS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ernest Kirk, et al v. Calhoun County, MI, et al
as 20-1365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAUDIA KIRK and ERNEST KIRK
Defendant:
GREG GAMMONS, Deputy, acting in his individual capacity, all jointly and severally, DEPUTY BRANDON SPARKS, MATTHEW SAXTON, Sheriff, acting individually and in his official capacity, all jointly and severally and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CALHOUN COUNTY, MI, a municipal corporation, all jointly and severally and CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, acting in his individual capacity
Sparks v. Arkansas State Police
as 4:2019cv00580
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sparks
Defendant:
Arkansas State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Arkansas State Police Department
as 4:2019cv00300
Defendant:
Arkansas State Police Department
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Baptist Health
as 4:2018cv00520
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sparks
Defendant:
Baptist Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
