Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. City of New York
as 17-1264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ariel Douglas
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Police Officer Anthony DiFrancesca, Shield No. 04200, Police Sergeant Brian Byrnes, Shield No. 969 and others
Defendant:
John Does and Richard Roes
Byrne v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00759
Plaintiff:
Brian Byrne
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Nanclares et al v. RPM Mortgage, Inc.
as 4:2016cv07188
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nanclares , Carl Knecht , David Glaser and others
Defendant:
RPM Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01918
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Allen
Defendant:
City of New York, Edward Winski, Brian Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv08124
Plaintiff:
Ariel Douglas
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Anthony DiFrancesca, Jerome Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Milbank, Jr., et al v. Michael Simsons, et al
as 13-51191
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SIMONS BROADCASTING, L.P.
Appellee:
ROBERT MILBANK, JR., In His Capacity as Plan Implementation Agent, EVERETT G. STRONG, BRIAN BYRNES and others
Appellant:
MICHAEL SIMSONS and PROMISELAND TELEVISION NETWORK, INCORPORATED
Byrne v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv04720
Plaintiff:
Brian Byrne
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
MY FA Network, Inc. v. meshIP, LLC et al
as 0:2010cv60851
Plaintiff:
My Fa Network, Inc.
Defendant:
MeshIP, LLC. , Brian Byrne and Jessica Obermayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
