Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Widland v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05719
Plaintiff:
Brian Douglas Widland, Jr
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01480
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Brian Douglas Edwards
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
ANTHONY v. MANGES
as 1:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DOUGLAS ANTHONY
Defendant:
TODD MANGES, GARY SEYMOUR, MARK LINDSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Haver v. Marriott International Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Haver
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc., Brian Douglas Thompson and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rambo v. Lumpkin
as 21-11136
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brian Douglas Rambo
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
ROACH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38004
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DOUGLAS ROACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBBINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30532
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DOUGLAS ROBBINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05593
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DOUGLAS LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Garfield County Detention Ctr et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Kelli LNU, FNU Bushman, Garfield County Detention Ctr and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Douglas Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Smith v. Martin Frink, et al
as 20-36099
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM FOX and MARTIN FRINK
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN DOUGLAS SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
