Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pawochawog-Mequinosh v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Wolf Pawochawog-Mequinosh and Brian Keith Brownell
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Wayne T. Salisbury, William . Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, et al v. City of Boston
as 20-1691
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARTIN JOSEPH, KENNETH SOUSA, BRIAN KEITH LATSON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TINKER and JOHN M. JOHNSON
Interested Party:
MA HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION
Defendant / Appellant:
BOSTON, MA
Cavitt v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv12479
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Cavitt
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Abbe E. Nelligan, Joy Gallant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Smith, et al v. City of Boston
as 16-8034
Plaintiff - Respondent:
BRUCE SMITH, PAUL JOSEPH, MARTIN JOSEPH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. JOHNSON and ROBERT TINKER
Defendant - Petitioner:
BOSTON, MA, Massachusetts
Interested Party:
MA HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION
Guptill v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2013cv00445
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Guptill
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mullen v. General Hospital
as 1:2013cv11283
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Mullen
Defendant:
General Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DUBE v. SOCIAL
as 2:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH DUBE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
