Cases 1 - 10 of 27
BEY v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
ABJUL BEY and JAGUAR SUN OF BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION
Defendant:
JUDGE BRADLEY R. ALLEN, SR., GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAW RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
BRINKLEY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00499
Petitioner:
RAEKWON MARQUIS TAISHAWN BRINKLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brinkley v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
John Brinkley
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
BRINKLEY v. USA
as 1:2022cv00706
Petitioner:
RAEKWON MARQUIS TAISHAWN BRINKLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brinkley v. Strickland et al
as 5:2019ct03343
Plaintiff:
Dontail Brinkley
Defendant:
Major Strickland, Keith Stone, Corporal Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkley v. Stone et al
as 5:2019ct03341
Defendant:
Lt. Parker, Major Strickland and Keith Stone
Plaintiff:
Dontail Brinkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkley v. Nurse Janet
as 5:2019ct03245
Plaintiff:
Dontail Brinkley
Defendant:
Nurse Janet and Nurse Judy Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLSON et al v. SELECT MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00519
Plaintiff:
BRIONA ALLEN, CAMERON MOODY, TAMMY ROGERS and others
Defendant:
KIPLING FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, LOANMAX, LLC, LOANSMART, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carotrans International, Inc. v. Carolina Recycle Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00448
Defendant:
David Carl Brinkley, Carolina Recycle Partners, LLC, David Allen Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Carotrans International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gist v. Kubin et al
as 5:2016ct03103
Plaintiff:
Darrell F. Gist
Defendant:
Rachel Kubin, Franklin Olmo, Tawfiq Ansari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
