Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lane v. AFAM Concept, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv13069
Plaintiff:
Brooke Lane
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 18 Twin Brook Lane, Coventry, RI
as 1:2018cv00486
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 18 Twin Brook Lane, Coventry, RI
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Counter Claimant:
Qing Si Liu
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 3306 Summer Brooke Lane, Union City, Fulton County, Georgia, and All Buidings, Appurtenances, Improvements, and Attachments thereon
as 1:2018cv02901
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
3306 Summer Brooke Lane, Union City, Fulton County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1501
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Melanie Wright v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 16-1393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELANIE WRIGHT, Administratix, Successor in Interest, Record Property Owner, Personal Representative, for the Estate of Earl Wright
Plaintiff:
EARL WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Debtor - Appellee:
BALTIMORE HOME ALLIANCE, LLC
United States of America v. 1777 Old Camp Trail, NW Conyers, GA et al
as 1:2011cv01534
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1777 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, GA, 1766 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, Georgia, 1700 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, Georgia and others
Claimant:
Larry Simmons and All-Star Properties & Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
