Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Roberts v. Rester et al
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
Justin Rester, Department of Public Safety and Corrections Louisiana State and Louisiana State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2018cv00787
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy and Jimmy E. LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2016cv00600
Defendant:
Stephanie Lamartinere, Randy Lavespere, Jimmy Leblanc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2014cv00663
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
Jerry W Goodwin, Jamie Fussell, Karen Bays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2014cv00113
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
Jerry W Goodwin, James M LeBlanc, Chris Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conrad v. Miles, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00874
Plaintiff:
Stephen N. Conrad, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Miles, Chris Ownesby, Ken Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Roberts v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 13-31114
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRYAN CLAYTON ROBERTS
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Roberts v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2013cv02834
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
Jerry W Goodwin, Lonnie Nail, Mark Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2013cv00914
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Jerry Goodwin, Brenda Acklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Emanuel et al
as 5:2012cv02775
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
Leon L Emanuel, III, Paula Moreno, Latonya Hocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
