Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Glass v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00207
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
William Bryan Glass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Combier v. Portelos et al
as 1:2017cv02239
Defendant:
Lucio Celli, Carmen Farina, Bryan Glass and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Combier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Prolite Building Supply LLC et al v. Ply Gem Windows et al
as 2:2015cv01049
Plaintiff:
Prolite Building Supply LLC , Joshua Sanders , John Sather and others
Defendant:
Ply Gem Windows and James Iverson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Benito Acosta v. City of Costa Mesa, et al
as 10-56854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENITO ACOSTA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF COSTA MESA and ALLAN MANSOOR, Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa, in his official and individual capacities
Defendant:
JOHN HENSLEY, Chief of Police, Costa Mesa Police Department, in his official and individual capacities, DAVID ANDERSEN, in their official and individual capacities, DAVID DEHUFF, in their official and individual capacities and others
Joseph Shaheen v. Burgess Yonts, et al
as 09-6033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH SHAHEEN, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Nadia Shaheen, deceased
Defendant:
BURGESS HARRISON YONTS, MURRAY PI, LLC, LAKEE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INCORPORATED, an Indiana Corporation, LAMBDA ETA CHAPTER OF LAMBDA CHI ALPHA, a Kentucky Corporation, LAMBDA CHI ALPHA HOUSE CORPORATION OF MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY, a Kentucky Corporation and others
Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan et al v. Tuner et al
as 3:2009cv00724
Plaintiff:
Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan, Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan, Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan and others
Defendant:
SagePoint Financial, Inc., AIG Financial Advisor Services and Spelman & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
