Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Dickson v. Lue
as 1:2022cv00765
Petitioner:
Bryan Kerr Dickson
Respondent:
D. Lue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dickson v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00735
Defendant:
Lisa Sunderman, All Federal Agent(s)/Correctional Officials at the Medical Department, Mr Dowg and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kerr Dickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryan Dickson v. US
as 19-6750
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JOHN GILLEY, FEDERAL AGENT / CORRECTIONAL AGENT JOE DOE, 1 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Bryan Dickson v. USA, et al
as 17-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LORETTA LYNCH, Atty General, MICHAEL D. TAFELSKI, Regional Counsel and others
Bryan Dickson v. US
as 17-6624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, LORETTA LYNN and others
Bryan Dickson v. USA, et al
as 17-10635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES M SAMMUELS, JR. and others
Dickson v. United State
as 16-6367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bryan Dickson v. USA
as 16-6840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON, aka Bryan K. Dickson
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bryan Dickson v. USA
as 16-56864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bryan Dickson v. USA, et al
as 16-17284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMMUELS, Jr., Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, DESIGNATION AND SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER, DSCC, Designation Coordinator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
