Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv03435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown Budda New York, LLC v. Town of Southampton et al
as 2:2025cv05053
Plaintiff:
Brown Budda New York, LLC
Defendant:
Town of Southampton and New York State-Office of Cannabis Management (OCM)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Donald (Hayes)
as 25-933
Defendant:
ERIC HAYES, TREVON WRIGHT, TRAVON JONES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Donald (Jones)
as 25-761
Defendant:
TRAVON JONES, TREVON WRIGHT, ERIC HAYES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Donald (Wright)
as 25-608
Defendant:
TREVON WRIGHT, ERIC HAYES, TRAVON JONES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Donald
as 25-455
Defendant:
TREVON WRIGHT, ERIC HAYES, TRAVON JONES and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carter v. Guinn et al
as 5:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Robin C. Carter
Defendant:
FNU Guinn, Gerald Anderson, Josh Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Donald (Moore)
as 23-6779
Defendant:
TREVON WRIGHT, ERIC HAYES, TRAVON JONES and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRONE MOORE and Ty Ralph Lauren
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Andrell Rodgers v. Alien Records, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05139
Defendant:
Terrell McNeal, Norva Denton, DOES 1-10 inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Andrell Rodgers and Andrell D Rogers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Moreland et al v. Black Budda Associates, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv30091
Plaintiff:
Paola Canas, Rosa Acosta, Sara Underwood and others
Defendant:
Paul Ramesh and Black Budda Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
