Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ward v. John Doe et al
as 5:2023ct03272
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ward
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Sgt. Christopher Bunting, Chip Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunting v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2022ct03331
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Bunting
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Messer v. Craven County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2022ct03065
Plaintiff:
Matthew Douglas Messer
Defendant:
Craven County Sheriff's Department, Craven County Detention Center, Chip Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUNTING v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH BUNTING
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bunting v. Department of the Navy et al
as 7:2019cv00067
Defendant:
Department of the Navy and Camp Lejune Marine Base
Plaintiff:
Gregory W. Bunting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KADEL et al v. FOLWELL et al
as 1:2019cv00272
Plaintiff:
JASON FLECK, MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR., MAXWELL KADEL and others
Defendant:
DEE JONES, NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunting v. Dever et al
as 5:2017ct03202
Plaintiff:
Bruce Bunting
Defendant:
James C. Dever, III, Diane Browning and Timothy N. Zagar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunting v. Cooper et al
as 5:2017ct03098
Plaintiff:
Bruce Bunting
Defendant:
Roy A. Cooper, UNC Medical Center and James Engleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunting v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Tiffany D. Bunting
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015ct03166
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. King
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Charles Ratledge, Vikki Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
