Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Harris v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Harris
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Nicholas Doage, Jeff Linden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Anthony Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt and Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
Anthony Anderson, Muhammad Ali Jr., Albuquerque International Support and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. Marion Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Angela Ford
Defendant:
Marion Police Department, Nick McPike, Brennan Busche and others
Other:
Scott Bunnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Matthew Miller v. Dan Wilcot, et al
as 23-3623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant / Appellee:
Dan Wilcot, William K. Busch, Lynn Miller and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
