Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ray v. T Lambert Incorporated, et al
as 4:2026cv09690
Defendant:
Glen Terrell, Nova Lines, Inc., Alex Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Barker v. Lumpkin
as 23-20234
Petitioner / Appellant:
Byron Ray Barker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Barker v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03001
Petitioner:
Byron Ray Barker
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TOWNSEND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv15126
Plaintiff:
BYRON RAY TOWNSEND
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00378
Plaintiff:
Byron Ray Clark
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Byron Phillips v. Warden, et al
as 19-11324
Defendant / Appellee:
SIMMONS, WALKER, THOMAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BYRON RAY PHILLIPS
Clark v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13802
Plaintiff:
Byron Ray Clark
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Byron Ray Mathieu v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 5:2013cv02058
Defendant:
Dave Cox, Does, Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Ray Mathieu
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Byron Ray Mathieu et al
as 5:2013cv00774
Defendant:
Does, Byron Ray Mathieu and Chandra Belle Mathieu
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Toast Time, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv02268
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Toast Time, Inc. and Donald Byron Ray
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
