Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Shaun Allen v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 22-2069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaun C. Allen
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Arkansas, City of Conway, Reynolds, Magistrate Judge, Conway District Court and others
Epperson v. Mathis et al
as 4:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Henry Epperson
Defendant:
R Mathis, C Allen and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2021cv01152
Plaintiff:
Shaun C Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Conway, City of, Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hose v. Wilke et al
as 4:2019cv00573
Defendant:
Brian William McEachen, Trustee Robert Wilke and Trustee C. Allen Parker
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C Hose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. Kelly et al
as 5:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
Shaun C Allen
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Straughn, Budnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. USA et al
as 4:2016cv00484
Plaintiff:
Shaun C Allen
Defendant:
USA, Faulkner County, Arkansas, Andy Shock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNamee et al v. McPherson et al
as 4:2015cv00767
Plaintiff:
Joseph H McNamee, Patrick Kimmel, Shaun C Allen and others
Defendant:
USA, Faulkner County, Arkansas, Andy Shock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaun Allen v. John Staley, et al
as 15-2567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shaun C. Allen
Defendant - Appellee:
John Staley, Sheriff, Lonoke County Detention Center, Bufford, Lt, Lonoke County Detention Center, John Does, Major, Lonoke County Detention Center; Captain, Lonoke County Detention Center and others
Tucker v. Holliday et al
as 4:2014cv00700
Plaintiff:
Danuwell Tucker
Defendant:
Doc Holliday, M Kelly, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
