Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gifford, II v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
David Gifford, II
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee , Bedford County Sheriff's Department , Bedford County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gifford v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Bedford County Correctional Facility, Bedford County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
David Gifford, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tustin v. Livingston et al
as 3:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
George Edward Tustin, Jr
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Frankie Reescano, Grizelda Bouchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tustin v. Livingston et al
as 4:2011cv04410
Plaintiff:
George Edward Tustin, Jr
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Frankie Reescano, Grizelda Bouchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Exablate of Phoenix LLC et al
as 4:2008cv00166
Plaintiff:
Wachovia Bank, National Association and Wachovia Bank, National Association
Defendant:
ExAblate of Phoenix, LLC, Deployed Medical Solutions, Inc., Florian T. Walter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Cotton Creek Circles, LLC et al v. Boyce et al
as 1:2007cv02179
Plaintiff:
Cotton Creek Circles, LLC, James River Capital Corp. and Deepwater Development, LLC
Defendant:
Gary C. Boyce, Boyce Land & Cattle Co., San Luis Valley Water Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
AUSTIN et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2007cv66840
Plaintiff:
MILDRED L. AUSTIN, JOHN W. BAILEY, MARY BAILEY and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
