Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Carter v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv27879
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03368
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re Darrell Gene Carter
as 0:2026mc00101
Unknown:
Darrell Gene Carter
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
RINCON v. CENTURION MEDICAL OKALOOSA CI et al
as 3:2026cv05342
Defendant:
C PATEL, MYERS, M CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RINCON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SE Synod Of The Evangelical Lutheran Church, et al v. Steven Finney, et al
as 26-5990
Defendant:
HANS SCHWENDIMANN, All in their official capacities as the district attorneys general of Tennessee, CHRIS STANFORD, in their official capacities as the district attorneys general of Tennessee, STEVEN JOHN MULROY, in their official capacities as the district attorneys general of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, GARRETT CAUSEY, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons and SOUTHEASTERN SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA
Dennis CarterIn re: Dennis Carter
as 26-1988
Respondent:
WARDEN CHRIS KING
Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS CARTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ronnie KingIn re: Ronnie King
as 26-14092
Respondent:
MADISON COUNTY ALABAMA, MEGHAN GOMEZ, REGINA CARTER and others
Petitioner:
In re: RONNIE EUGENE KING
Carter v. Wills
as 1:2026cv13401
:
Service List and Scanning Hill
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Petitioner:
Calvin L Carter, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
