Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00364
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
915) 598-9002 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Agha-Khan v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02739
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Defendant:
Akerman Senterfitt, LLP, David Alessi, Robert Alessi and others
702) 471-7070 (fax:
Merscorp Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Peters v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Deborah G Cockrell, Thomas R Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferraiuolo v. Pesek et al
as 5:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Ferraiuolo
Defendant:
Leon Pesek, Micheal W Shepherd, James Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05217
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cox
as 0:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Lori C. Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00440
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
915) 598-9002 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Cox v. Warren County Jail et al
as 4:2016cv04166
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Cox
Defendant:
Martin Edwards, Bruce Morath, Matt Gallop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv00639
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Spivey
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, G Taylor, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Smith
as 5:2016ct03107
Plaintiff:
Julius C. Cox
Defendant:
Mrs. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
