Cases 1 - 10 of 17,133
Youngblood v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv03697
Plaintiff:
James P Youngblood
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Davol Inc, John Doe Sales Representative 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkinson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv00307
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Isaac Glen Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vest v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01397
Plaintiff:
Patrick O Vest
Defendant:
Davol Inc, John Doe, C R Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al.
as 3:2020cv00824
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: C.R. Bard, Inc
as 20-2139
Not Classified By Court:
In re: C.R. BARD, INCORPORATED, Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
Appellant:
LANA C. KEETON
Defendant / Appellee:
C. R. BARD, INC. and C. R. BARD
Shelton v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00606
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Shelton
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R BARD INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheeks v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01040
Plaintiff:
Denise Cheeks
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Does 1 through 100 inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hazley v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01039
Plaintiff:
Laverne Hazley
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, Does 1 through 100 inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pilger v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv02563
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Pilger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dorsey v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv02555
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc., McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
