Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Heath
as 2:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Capitol Indemnity Corporation
Defendant:
John C. Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Heath-Fitzgerald v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Heath-Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rhodes et al v. PGX Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rhodes, Cassandra Mason and John Bray
Defendant:
PGX Holdings, Inc., Progrexion Teleservices, Inc., Progrexion Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
Hansen v. PGX Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Hansen
Defendant:
PGX Holdings, Inc., Progrexion Teleservices, Inc., Progrexion Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Progrexion Marketing, et al
as 23-4032
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
Defendant / Appellant:
PROGREXION MARKETING, INC., PGX HOLDINGS, INC., PROGREXION TELESERVICES, INC. and others
Tanner v. John C. Heath, et al.
as 3:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Whitney Tanner
Defendant:
John C. Heath dba Lexington Law, Progrexion Marketing, Inc., Efolks, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Jermaine Stewart v. John C. Heath et al
as 2:2022cv03768
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Stewart
Defendant:
John C. Heath Attorney at Law PC doing business as Lexington Law and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DOYLE v. HEATH
as 2:2021cv17255
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DOYLE
Defendant:
JOHN C. HEATH, PC doing business as LEXINGTON LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
