Cases 1 - 10 of 135
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Henderson v. Christopher Vertz
as 24-1697
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. HENDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER VERTZ
HENDERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02220
Plaintiff:
HEATHER C. HENDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HENDERSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00502
Petitioner:
MICHAEL C. HENDERSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Henderson, Michael v. Ribault, Justin et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Henderson
Defendant:
Justin S. Ribault, Kaitlin Kinyon, Shanta Anderson and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. LAVERGNE et al
as 3:2023cv02374
Plaintiff:
BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
D LAVERGNE, C HENDERSON, BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06793
Plaintiff:
DEREK C HENDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. Pollard et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Michael C Henderson
Defendant:
William Pollard, Steve Scheuler, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Henderson v. Department of Correction et al
as 0:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Mike C. Henderson
Defendant:
Department of Correction, St. Peter Minnesota Hospital, c/o Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
