Cases 1 - 10 of 114
May v. Target Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Robert C May
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Ferrandino & Son, Inc. and Joey's Lawn Pro LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mays, Gary v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Gary C. Mays, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitten v. Mays et al
as 7:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Antwon Whitten
Defendant:
C. Mays, Gibson and Grubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hundley v. Frunzi
as 23-581
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Crushaun Hundley
Defendant:
R. Snyder, Correction Officer, B. O'Rourke, Correction Officer, Carroll, Captain and others
Defendant / Appellant:
A. Frunzi, Correction Officer, C. May, Correction Officer and T. Mallare, Sergeant
May et al v. Barclays PLC et al
as 1:2023cv02583
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ruth May, Dr. Donna Ledgerwood, Dr. Ruth C. May and others
Defendant:
Barclays PLC and BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Mai v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv07344
Plaintiff:
Ninh C. Mai
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strebe v. Hicks et al
as 1:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Brian David Strebe
Defendant:
D. Hicks, M. Robinson, D. Slaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02789
Plaintiff:
Adam C. Mays
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
