Cases 1 - 10 of 736
IN RE: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb, et al
as 1:2024cv03094
Not Yet Classified:
Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust
Defendant:
Jeremiah Darnell Webb, Noah Sencer Robert Barclay, Malakai Levi Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02834
Plaintiff:
Aria C. Miller
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation and Mew Mew Fashions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miller v. Chick-Fil-A Inc et al
as 1:2024cv02539
Plaintiff:
Aria C. Miller
Defendant:
Chick-Fil-A Inc and Chick-Fil-A Franchise Operator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
James C Miller
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Smith v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Morgan Smith
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. FCC Forrest City Warden, et al
as 24-10452
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant:
FCC FORREST CITY WARDEN, BLAIR, RANDLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
