Cases 21 - 30 of 67
PETERSON v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv04669
Plaintiff:
ALEX PETERSON
Defendant:
C/O/ KEISHA WATSON, C/O/ JOHN DOE ELBY and C/O/ JOHN DOE 2 KENNIZAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargarten v. Burton et al
as 1:2021cv01260
Plaintiff:
Brian Hargarten
Defendant:
Christian Burton, Craig Wilson, Jamie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Dixon Correctinal Center Staff Members et al
as 1:2021cv04402
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cole
Defendant:
Dixon Correctinal Center Staff Members, C/O Simpson, C/O Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sammons v. Smith, III et al
as 1:2021cv01484
Plaintiff:
Angela Y. Sammons
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, William K Smith, III, Darlene B. Smith, As intestate heir of William K. Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mottley v. Rollins et al
as 1:2021cv02705
Plaintiff:
Devin Mottley and Skylar Mottley
Defendant:
Pinrod, Gray, IA/Gang Intel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv00441
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, BLANCHE CARNEY, MAJOR GIANETTI and others
Plaintiff:
EVERETT KEITH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANUEL v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2020cv01759
Defendant:
ASST SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, C/O SERGENT WILES, C/O LT. DAILEY and others
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Conway v. Ulrich et al
as 3:2020cv00330
Defendant:
Kimberly Ulrich, C/O Watson and C/O John Doe
Plaintiff:
Gregory Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00310
Defendant:
F.D.O.C. Secretary Julie Jones, The Warden John Doe, C/O John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander F. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Parsons et al
as 3:2020cv00405
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, CCII L. Garnica, CCII E. Aukerman and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
