Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jett v. Powell
as 7:2023cv01674
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Jett, Jr., Tara S. Jett, I.R.J. and others
Defendant:
The Country Acres Association of Columbus County Ltd., George Parker Coleman, Michael P. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Daniel Jamison v. Mark Amonette
as 22-6313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL W. JAMISON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK AMONETTE, Virginia Department of Corrections Chief Medical Director and PAUL OHAI, Doctor, Dillwyn Correctional Center
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, NATARCHA GREGG, MSA, RD, State wide Dietitian for VADOC, DANA RATLIFFE, Warden, Dillwyn Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jamison v. Northam et al
as 3:2020cv00339
Defendant:
L. Kingley, J. Suhcur, RN, Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Powell et al
as 3:2019cv00577
Defendant:
Officer N. Petino, Officer S. McCauley, Lieutenant Sherard Tisdale and others
Plaintiff:
Aundrey Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Clark et al
as 7:2018cv00504
Defendant:
L. Mason, Mr. Allen, M.E. Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel W Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Ethan Allen Operations, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
Susan C. Powell
Defendant:
Ethan Allen Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Powell v. USA
as 5:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
Rose C. Powell
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
