Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
System Studies & Simulation v. US
as 21-1469
Defendant / Appellee:
CAE USA INC. and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
L3 DOSS AVIATION, INC.
System Studies & Simulation v. US
as 21-1428
Defendant / Appellee:
CAE USA INC. and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
SYSTEM STUDIES & SIMULATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L3 DOSS AVIATION, INC.
FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC. v. USA
as 1:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
CAE USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Chartis Insurance UK Limited v. CAE USA, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Chartis Insurance UK Limited
Defendant:
CAE USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moreno v. CAE USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00905
Plaintiff:
Sean Moreno
Defendant:
CAE USA, Inc. , Seaworld Parks and Entertainment, Inc. and Does 1 to 40
Cross_claimant:
CAE USA, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Seaworld Parks and Entertainment, Inc. and Roes 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
State of New York et al v. CAE USA, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01010
Plaintiff:
State of New York , The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Joseph Martens
Defendant:
CAE USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Cause of Action Arising under CERCLA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
