Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CarMax, Inc. v. Montgomery Sibley
as 19-1492
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CARMAX, INC. and CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellant:
MONTGOMERY B. SIBLEY
India Kahclamat v. William Nash, et al
as 18-10709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIA SAMONE KAHCLAMAT, Intervenor
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM NASH, THOMAS REEDY, SARAH EDMONDSON, and Representatives on Behalf of and others
CarMax, Inc. v. Montgomery Sibley
as 18-1261
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARMAX, INC. and CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY B. SIBLEY
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Montgomery Sibley
as 16-2305
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY B. SIBLEY
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD W. BLACK, LITTLER MENDELSON, P. C. and JOSHUA B. WAXMAN
Barry A. Drake v. Carmax, Inc.
as 12-1083
Plaintiff:
REGINA HANKINS
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellee:
BARRY A. DRAKE
Defendant - Appellant:
CARMAX, CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Carmax the Auto Superstore and CARMAX OF LAUREL, LLC
Kenneth Johnson v. Carmax
as 10-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and CERONE MCTAVOUS, individually and on behalf of all other personse similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CARMAX, Inc. and CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INCORPORATED
Jonathan Riches v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Incor
as 08-7487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INCORPORATED and WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Riches v. Carmax Auto Superstores Incorporated et al
as 6:2008cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores Incorporated and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
