Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ROMAN et al v. M & T BANK et al
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
JOANNE MARIE ROMAN, CARMELO ROMAN TORRES, M J R and others
Defendant:
M & T BANK, KML LAW GROUP, P.C. and J. ERIC KISHBAUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Carlos Ramos
as 19-2925
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS RAMOS, a/k/a CARMELO ROMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SDM Holdings, Inc., et al v. UBS Financial Services, Inc., et al
as 16-8040
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
SDM HOLDINGS INC, CARMELO ROMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and RICARDO ROMAN-RIVERA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INCORPORATED OF PUERTO RICO, UBS TRUST COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO, MIGUEL A. FERRER and others
Plaintiff:
ONNASIS CORPORATION and JULIO TORMES-RODRIQUEZ
Defendant:
PUERTO RICO INVESTORS TAX-FREE FUND IV, INC., PUERTO RICO FIXED INCOME FUND III, INC., PUERTO RICO FIXED INCOME FUND V, INC. and others
IN RE: UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. OF PUERTO RICO SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2015mc00191
Defendant:
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INCORPORATED OF PUERTO RICO , UBS TRUST COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO , UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SDM HOLDINGS INC. , CARMELO ROMAN and RICARDO ROMAN-RIVERA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Roman et al v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2012cv01663
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Roman , Ricardo Roman-Rivera and SDM Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services, Inc. of Puerto Rico, UBS Trust Company of Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico Investors Tax-Free Fund IV, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
ROMAN v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv02340
Plaintiff:
CARMELO ROMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roman-Colon v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00892
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Roman-Colon
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
