Cases 1 - 10 of 36
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
CARDWELL v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, DEPUTY TAYLOR, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. ZBOROVANCIK
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
MARK CLARK
Defendant:
BRIAN ZBOROUANCIK, BRIAN ZBOROVANCIK, ADAM CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Caro v. Keener et al
as 4:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
Miguel Caro
Defendant:
Jennifer Keener and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENDLETON vs. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL
as 3:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDANT ERIC W. TICE and DAN CARO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. DEMASKE et al
as 2:2020cv01226
Defendant:
RICHARDS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GRIM, LIEUTENANT RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv00790
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, OFFICER JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv02731
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, T.A. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv04050
Defendant:
Tylor, D Valentin, Doran and others
Plaintiff:
Yakl Lee, Anthony Cross, Curtis Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
