Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Hatcher v. CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
Arrayonia Hatcher
Defendant:
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., ERMC II, L.P., Gene Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
Roger Reed
Defendant:
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. , ERMC Management Services, Inc. and City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. ERMC II, L.P. et al
as 5:2010cv00386
Plaintiff:
Delphia Bishop
Defendant:
ERMC II, L.P. , CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. and CBL & Associates Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murry v. Jefferson Mall Company, L.P. et al
as 3:2010cv00565
Plaintiff:
Sheniqua Murry
Defendant:
Jefferson Mall Company, L.P. , CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. and ERMC II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oliver v. CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation et al
as 3:2009cv50264
Plaintiff:
Yvette Oliver
Defendant:
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation and CBL/CHERRYVALE I, LLC, a Delaware corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Connors v. CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00172
Plaintiff:
Christopher Connors
Defendant:
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kranish et al v. Hogshead et al
as 3:2008cv50083
Plaintiff:
Shaun A Kranish and Svetlana Kranish
Defendant:
Thomas A Hogshead, Simon A Avery, Randall E Paul and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arrington v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
Flora Arrington
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
