Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Camille Sedar v. Reston Town Center Property
as 19-1972
3Rd Party Defendant:
CDA INCORPORATED, d/b/a MaxSent
Defendant / Appellee:
RESTON TOWN CENTER PROPERTY, LLC and BOSTON PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
BEACON CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC and BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAMILLE SEDAR
Sedar v. Boston Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01111
Plaintiff:
Camille Sedar
Defendant:
Beacon Capital Partners LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Reston Town Center Property, LLC, Boston Properties, Inc. and Boston Properties Limited Partnership
3Rd Party Defendant:
CDA Incorporated, d/b/a MaxSent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02628
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Britt et al v. CDA, Incorporated et al (MAG+)
as 1:2010cv00238
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Britt and John H. Thompson
Defendant:
CDA, Incorporated and Clifton Dates
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
United Government Security Officers of America, International Union v. CDA Incorporated
as 2:2010cv00017
Plaintiff:
United Government Security Officers of America, International Union
Defendant:
CDA Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
