General Cases
Church v. Director, TN DOC et al
as 1:2018cv00157
Petitioner: William L Church
Respondent: Director, TN DOC, Chairman, TN Parole Board, Gov. State of Tenn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Emerson v. Chairman, Texas Parole Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv01121
Plaintiff: Christopher J Emerson
Defendant: Chairman, Texas Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Emerson v. Chairman, Texas Parole Board
as 4:2016cv02187
Plaintiff: Christopher J Emerson
Defendant: Chairman, Texas Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Emerson v. Chairman, Texas Parole Board
as 6:2016cv01025
Plaintiff: Christopher J Emerson
Defendant: Chairman, Texas Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clarence Sanders v. Stacy Kincade
as 15-7347
Petitioner - Appellant: CLARENCE SANDERS
Respondent - Appellee: STACY KINCADE, Sheriff, Fairfax County Adult Detention Center and KAREN BROWN, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board
Church v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00320
Petitioner: William L. A. Church
Respondent: Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Attorney General Of Virginia, Director, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas O'Neil v. Todd Kloska, et al
as 14-2042
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS LEE O'NEIL
Respondent - Appellee: TODD KLOSKA, Superving Parole Agent and TOM COMBS, Chairman, Michigan Parole Board
Eduard Lorenz v. Charles Davis, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-7598
Petitioner - Appellant: EDUARD LORENZ
Respondent - Appellee: CHARLES E. DAVIS, III
Respondent - None: CHAIRMAN, VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD
Lorenz v. Chairman Va. Parole Board
as 1:2007cv00940
Petitioner: Eduard Lorenz
Respondent: Chairman Va. Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?