Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Alan Wilson
as 23-1372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, a/k/a Doctor Faltas, a/k/a Doctor Assa'ad-Faltas, MD, MPH
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, officially and individually, BYRON E. GIPSON, officially for prospective relief, GARY H. WATTS, officially for prospective relief and others
White v. State of Florida
as 8:2021cv01936
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony White
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Watson
as 8:2021cv01395
Defendant:
Paul Watson
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv02479
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas, Dr. Assa and Dr. Faltas
Defendant:
John H. Strom, Dinah Gail Steele, Hugh Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. ALFONSO et al
as 1:2020cv00387
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE, LLC, DANIEL J. ALFONSO, CHARLES G. WHITE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. WILSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv03031
Defendant:
. Trainer, . Engel, Rob Jeffreys and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White, Jr v. The State of Georgia Department of Corrections
as 3:2019cv00187
Defendant:
The State of Georgia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Charles David White, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White, Jr v. The State of Georgia Department of Corrections
as 4:2019cv00296
Defendant:
The State of Georgia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Charles David White, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White #177157 v. Govorchin et al
as 2:2018cv00138
Defendant:
Camille Sliger, Anthony Peter Govorchin and Michael C. Eagen
Plaintiff:
Charles Bruce White #177157
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. OLENS
as 3:2018cv00065
Petitioner:
CHARLES LAMAR WHITE, JR
Respondent:
SAM OLENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
