Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Bullard et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 1:2008cv00724
Plaintiff:
John G. Alexander, Clarence Edward Batts, Sr., Elnora Bell and others
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Dow Chemical Company, Koppers Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
VILLANI v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73423
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LOUIS VILLANI, CHARLES LOUIS VILLANI, CHARLES LOUIS VILLANI and others
Defendant:
A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MORAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67753
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. MORAN, SR., JOHN A. MORAN, SR., MARIE D. MORAN and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Brooks v. Etowah County Jail et al
as 4:2007cv01325
Plaintiff:
Charles Louis Brooks
Defendant:
Etowah County Jail, Doctors Care Services and Etowah County Medical Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Norris
as 5:2007cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Louis Jackson
Defendant:
Larry Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Jones
as 07-50684
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES LOUIS JONES, JR., also known as Charles Louis Jones
Maxwell, Lawrence, et al v. Snow, John
as 04-5082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lawrence Stephen Maxwell, Brenda L. Abbott, Dorothy A. Albrecht and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John W. Snow, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, United States Department of Treasury
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
