Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Smith v. Foulk
as 2:2014cv00529
Petitioner:
Charles R. Smith
Respondent:
Fred Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04943
Plaintiff:
Evelyn R. Smith and Charles R. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Foulk
as 2:2013cv02387
Petitioner:
Charles R Smith
Respondent:
Fred Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles R Smith v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2013cv07528
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Charles R Smith
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv11866
Plaintiff:
Kelly J. Smith and Charles R. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-11866
Plaintiff:
Kelly J. Smith and Charles R. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20262
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Charles Smith v. C. Gartley, et al
as 13-50154
Debtor:
In the Matter of: CHARLES R. SMITH and IRIS BERMAN-SMITH
Appellee:
CHARLES R. SMITH
Appellant:
C. DAVID GARTLEY and HARVEY E. GARTLEY
William Jamison, et al v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd'
as 12-17412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMISON, GEORGE SULLIVAN, JOAN ADELE SULLIVAN, husband and wife and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO. B0146LDUSA0701030
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00618
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
