Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Reeves v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2022cv04616
Petitioner:
Phillip C Reeves and Phillip Charles Reeves
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Director, Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Phillip Reeves v. Warden
as 22-7373
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP CHARLES REEVES
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Reeves v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2022cv02773
Petitioner:
Phillip Reeves and Phillip Charles Reeves
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden, Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16667
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CHARLES REEVES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01952
Plaintiff:
CHARLES REEVES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Brockenberry et al
as 5:2016cv03192
Plaintiff:
Alfrigh Williams
Defendant:
Ruby Brockenberry, Belinda E Timmons, John Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Colvin et al
as 3:2016cv01080
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reeves et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00675
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves , Ruby Reeves , William B. Reeves and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Reeves et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00675
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves , Ruby Reeves , William B. Reeves and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
