Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Ashford v. State Of Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Charles Vincent Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Ohio, City of Dayton, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. State of Ohio
as 3:2023cv00332
Petitioner:
Charles Vincent Ashford
Respondent:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Reed v. Sarah Kariko, et al
as 22-35616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES VINCENT REED
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH KARIKO, Chief Medical Officer, Dept of Corrections, RYAN HERRINGTON, Medical Director, Stafford Creek, JEANETTE NEIBERT, Registered Health Information Technician, Stafford Creek CC and others
Hively v. Bowers
as 3:2021cv00107
Petitioner:
Charles Vincent Hively, Jr.
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Collins v. LNU
as 5:2021cv00285
Petitioner:
Charles Vincent Collias and Charles Vincent Collins
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1153
Rice v. White
as 4:2021cv00041
Petitioner:
Charles Vincent Rice
Respondent:
Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rice v. White
as 1:2021cv00359
Petitioner:
Charles Vincent Rice
Respondent:
Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rice v. Freesemann et al
as 4:2020cv00212
Defendant:
ADA Nancy Greysmith, P.D. Robert Warren Attridge, Jr., District Attorney Meg Daly Heap and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Vincent Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Kariko et al
as 3:2020cv05580
Defendant:
Lara Strick, Jeannette Neibert, Elizabeth Eschbach and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Vincent Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv05915
Plaintiff:
Charles Vincent Reed
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Richard Morgan and Margaret Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
