Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kelly v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2020cv03133
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Kelly
Defendant:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.,, ABC Corps. #1-3, John Does #1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
Belinda Williams
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ware v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants Inc.
as 1:2017cv02109
Plaintiff:
Chloe Ware
Defendant:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PHILLIPS v. CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS, INC.
as 2:2017cv01661
Plaintiff:
CHERYL PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trisvan v. Kalex Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv07000
Defendant:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. and Kalex Partners, LLC
Plaintiff:
John Trisvan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pullen v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv27576
Plaintiff:
Jerald Pullen
Defendant:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. , Rallco Inc. and Silvano D'Allesandri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardaway v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv01575
Plaintiff:
Lena Hardaway
Defendant:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., Checkers/Rally Resturant, Adventures Three Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAMBERT et al v. CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT et al
as 2:2007cv03214
Plaintiff:
VOUNCILE LAMBERT and KEITH LAMBERT
Defendant:
CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT, CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS, INC., CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Franklin v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
as 2:2007cv02150
Plaintiff:
Arendell Franklin
Defendant:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
