Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Leaman v. NantKwest, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01351
Defendant:
NantKwest, Inc., Cheryl Cohen, Patrick Soon-Shiong and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Leaman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Hargett v. NantKwest, Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv00197
Defendant:
Patrick Soon-Shiong, ImmunityBio, Inc., Michael Blaszyk and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hargett
Jeremy Shokman v. Steven A Kriegsman et al
as 2:2018cv02218
Defendant:
Joel K Caldwell, John Y. Caloz, Anita H. Chawla and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shokman
Wilson v. Tokai Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10645
Plaintiff:
Jason Wilson
Defendant:
Tokai Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jodie P Morrison, Seth L Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bushanksy v. Tokai Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10621
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushanksy
Defendant:
Tokai Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Jodie P Morrison , Seth L Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
FINNEMEN v. TUCKER et al
as 1:2015cv08336
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
CHRISTINE TUCKER and CHERYL COHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. BEY
as 1:2015cv08222
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN MUNICIPAL COURT, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
NASIR EL RAZUL BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pasqualini v. Mortgageit, Inc.
as 1:2005cv09714
Plaintiff:
Corrine B. Pasqualini
Defendant:
Mortgageit, Inc. , Cheryl Cohen , Mark Pappas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pasqualini v. Mortgageit Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
Corrine B. Pasqualini
Defendant:
Mortgageit Inc, Mortgageit Inc, Mark Pappas and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Pasqualini v. Mortgageit Inc et al
as 3:2007mc00025
Plaintiff:
Corrine B. Pasqualini
Defendant:
Mortgageit Inc, Mortgageit Inc, Mark Pappas and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
