Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mabry et al v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al
as KYW/3:14-cv-00698
Plaintiff:
Marvin Mabry , Richard Maybury , Michael Stone and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, Inc. , DIRECTV, LLC and Multiband Corporation
Mabry et al v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00698
Plaintiff:
Marvin Mabry , Richard Maybury , Michael Stone and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, Inc., DIRECTV, LLC and Multiband Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Pamela Lee, et al v. Brian Abbott, et al
as 14-2388
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAMELA LEE, Officer, CANDACE BATTEN-LEE, TERESA WELBORN, Officer and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN ABBOTT, in his official capacity as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Indiana Public Retirement System, CHRIS ATKINS, in his official capacity as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Indiana Public Retirement System, KEN COCHRAN, in his official capacity as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Indiana Public Retirement System and others
LEE et al v. PENCE et al
as 1:2014cv00406
Defendant:
BRIAN ABBOTT, CHRIS ATKINS, KEN COCHRAN and others
Plaintiff:
CANDACE BATTEN-LEE, PAMELA LEE, MARTHA LEVERETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIMANCHE v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR
Defendant:
P K JOHNSON, S BEARDEN, TAMERA POYNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Curcione
as 10-1320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mashama Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Paul Curcione, Jeff Chawer, Tammy Williams and others
Dempsey et al v. City of Lawrenceburg, Kentucky et al
as 3:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Candice N. Dempsey, Candice N. Dempsey and Candice N. Dempsey
Defendant:
City of Lawrenceburg, Kentucky, Chris Atkins and Nathan Doty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Curcione et al
as 1:2007cv00357
Plaintiff:
Mashama Hill
Defendant:
Paul Curcione, Jeff Chawer, Tammy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
