Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kalyn Aga, et al v. Meade County
as 22-3046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Meade County, a political subdivision of the State of South Dakota
Aga et al v. Meade County et al
as 5:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant:
Meade County, KNAUF KG a German Corporation and United States Gypsum Corporation, (USG Corporation) an Illinois Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cragun et al v. Merrill
as 2:2020cv01517
Plaintiff:
Chris Nelson, Robert Corker, Heather Coleman and others
Defendant:
John H Merrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Nelson et al
as 4:2011cv04001
Plaintiff:
Wayne S. Smith
Defendant:
Mike Milstead , State of South Dakota , Jason Gant and others
Cross_claimant:
Mike Milstead
Cross_defendant:
Jason Gant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constitution Party of SD, et al v. Chris Nelson
as 10-2910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Constitution Party of South Dakota, Joy Howe, Marvin Meyer and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Chris Nelson, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of South Dakota
Constitution Party of South Dakota et al v. Chris Nelson
as 3:2010cv03011
Plaintiff:
Constitution Party of South Dakota , Joy Howe , Marvin Meyer and others
Defendant:
Chris Nelson, in his official capacity of Secretary of State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janis et al v. Nelson et al
as 5:2009cv05019
Plaintiff:
Eileen Janis and Kim Colhoff
Defendant:
Chris Nelson, Paula Jones, Gail Brock and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
