Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tyler v. Hansen et al
as 2:2024cv10980
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tyler
Defendant:
Karen Hansen, David Leyton and Chris Swanson
Crenshaw v. Minard et al
as 2:2024cv10955
Plaintiff:
DeMario Reed Crenshaw
Defendant:
Minard and Chris Swanson
Trouser v. Swanson et al
as 2:2024cv10699
Petitioner:
Waverly Lee Trouser, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Swanson and David Leyton
SHEPHARD v. HILLARD et al
as 1:2023cv03128
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
HILLARD, CHRIS SWANSON, PRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
McDonald et al v. Providence Alaska Medical Center et al
as 3:2018cv00159
Defendant:
Chris Swanson, St. Elias Specialty Hospital, The Hospitalist Group and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Dean McDonald and Heather Ann Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allen v. Morgan et al
as 1:2013cv00413
Plaintiff:
Vincent D. Allen
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Angel Chavas, Swanson Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Pobursky, et al v. Madera County, et al
as 11-15130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES S. POBURSKY and WANDA POBURSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
MADERA COUNTY, DOC'S TOWING AND TRANSPORT, CLIFTON GINN, in his individual capacity and others
Swanson v. Alvarado-Chinchilla et al
as 2:2009cv01299
Plaintiff:
Chris Swanson
Defendant:
Luis Diego Alvarado-Chinchilla and Eastern States Paving Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pobursky, et al. v. Madera County, et al.
as 1:2007cv00611
Plaintiff:
James S Pobursky and Wanda Pobursky
Defendant:
Madera County, Sheriff's Department of Madera County, Madera County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
