Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Washington v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv00448
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Matthew Bender & Company, C.O. Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Washington and Robert Bruce Gillens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
In re: Chris Washington-El
as 13-4740
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CHRIS WASHINGTON-EL
Defendant - Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, JOHN MURRAY, A.S. WILLIAMSON and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
J. CURTIS JOYNER
Chris Washington-El v. Secretary PA Dept of Corr, et al
as 13-3660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS WASHINGTON-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Washington-El v. Collins et al
as 3:2012cv01979
Plaintiff:
Chris Washington-El
Defendant:
Robert Collins, Anthony Kovalchik, Thomas Derfler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chris Washington v. David DiGuglielmo, et al
as 10-2462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS WASHINGTON-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, JOHN MURRAY, A. SCOTT WILLIAMSON and others
DeGruy et al v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2009cv04024
Plaintiff:
Hilda Oliver DeGruy, Hilda Oliver DeGruy, Michael DeGruy and others
Defendant:
Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WASHINGTON-EL v. BEARD
as 2:2008cv01688
Plaintiff:
CHRIS WASHINGTON-EL
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chris Washington v. David DiGuglielmo, et al
as 08-4692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, JOHN MURRAY, A. SCOTT WILLIAMSON and others
Chris Washington v. David DiGuglielmo, et al
as 08-4329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, JOHN MURRAY, A. SCOTT WILLIAMSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
