Cases 1 - 10 of 844
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schoene v. Christensen, et al.
as 24-2317
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY M. SCHOENE
Defendant:
PENELOPE CHRISTENSEN, an Oregon resident and PORTLAND HAIR EXTENSIONS BY PENELOPE, an active Oregon corporation
Buchanan v. Ziegler et al
as 2:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Eric Ramon Buchanan
Defendant:
Casey Ziegler, Mathew Sychia, Mathew Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Christensen v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00979
Petitioner:
Chad Andre Christensen
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashley v. Moore, et al.
as 24-1109
Plaintiff:
G. ASHLEY
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, JUSTIN PETERS, Officer, No. 37708, EDGAR MURO, Officer, No. 36863 and others
Rehms v. Post Falls Police Department, et al.
as 24-701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORRIE M. REHMS, a single person
Defendant / Appellee:
POST FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF POST FALLS, CITY OF COEUR D' ALENE and others
Christensen v. Curry County et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Richard Christensen
Defendant:
Curry County, Brad Alcorn, Chris Paasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weird Science LLC et al v. Rene Sindlev et al
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Weird Science LLC and William Anderson Wittekind
Defendant:
Rene Sindlev, Mark Dybul, Gregg Alton and others
Martell v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Leandre Martell
Defendant:
Well Path LLC, Kyle F Martineau, Ralph Aquino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparkman v. Bragg et al
as 6:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Dylan J. Sparkman
Defendant:
Bradley Bragg, Troy Christensen and Daniel Bruno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
